With a Capital ‘T’

Disinformation via Deceptions of Omission

Posted on by

The purpose of this article is to, hopefully, reign in the craziness around the internet regarding deceptive points made by accounts with large followings. To that end, this article is a single point in a galaxy of points to be made.

 
Too many stories are incomplete. In being abridged, they are deceptive. Words mean something. Leaving important words out of a story is a lie of omission.
 
For years now, there has been a lie running through the veins of social media. One claiming that individuals that we know have committed crimes against the people of the US will be subject to military tribunals. In some of the more bold cases, the claims are that such tribunals have already taken place.
 

Today’s word of omission is “Jurisdiction”

According to Cornell’s Legal Information Institute
“Jurisdiction can be defined as:
1) Power of a court to adjudicate cases and issue orders; or
2) Territory within which a court or government agency may properly exercise its power. See, e.g. Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co. et al., 526 U.S. 574 (1999).
Jurisdiction: An Overview
One of the most fundamental questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. A jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components:
The claims of pending as well as ongoing military tribunals against civilians is presented with admirably designed deceit. In specific, the claim is that certain civilians are currently facing or will be facing military tribunals. Many of the persons in question are elected officials, extremely wealthy persons, and heads of national institutions.
 
These claims would necessarily require the military’s jurisdiction to leapfrog over the Constitutional jurisdiction of civilian courts – a terrifying concept as such an overtaking of the courts would have far-reaching constitutional implications.
 

So What is the Jurisdiction of Military Tribunals?

According to Aaron Meyer Law:
In general, anyone who is subject to military law can be tried by a military tribunal. This includes:
  • Members of the armed forces. This encompasses all individuals who are serving or have served in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard. Active-duty personnel, reservists, and National Guard members are all subject to military law and can be tried by a military tribunal if they are accused of breaking the law.
  • Enemy combatants. Enemy combatants are individuals who are fighting against the United States in a war or other armed conflict. They can be tried by a military tribunal if they are accused of breaking the law.
  • Civilians working for the military. This includes contractors, employees of defense companies, and other civilians who are working for the military. Any of these individuals can find themselves subject to military law and in a military tribunal depending on the circumstances.

Again, words matter

The claims that civilians are subject to tribunals fail to articulate under what conditions any civilian might find themselves facing such tribunals. But in 1866, the US Supreme Court ruled on various questions in Ex Parte Milligan.
 
Justice Davis wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Justices Clifford, Field, Grier, and Nelson. The majority opinion stated that so long as civil courts were active at home, it was unconstitutional to try American citizens by military tribunal. They also said that Congress did not have the power to authorize a military commission in Indiana.
The majority also laid out the three situations where military tribunals were appropriate. They stated that Milligan must be released immediately as his rights had been violated and he had not been given due process of law.
 
Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/case.html
 
This case laid out the three types of military jurisdiction (taken from the site previously linked here):
  1. “The first of these may be called jurisdiction under MILITARY LAW, and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war, or otherwise providing for the government of the national forces”
  2. “The second may be distinguished as MILITARY GOVERNMENT, superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law, and exercised by the military commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress.”
  3. “The third may be denominated MARTIAL LAW PROPER, and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the action of Congress cannot be invited, and in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion, or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities where ordinary law no longer adequately secures public safety and private rights.”
Point 3 is frequently misconstrued among those insisting that tribunals are happening under martial law or laws of war.
 
NOTE: DoD’s Law of war is specific to armed conflict. The manual does NOT apply to activities within the US and its territories; a condition where all bets are off. It is a document reflecting the DoD’s interpretation and application of international laws regarding how one state shall manage affairs within other states that it occupies.
 

Martial Law

Martial Law is a declared state – under all US jurisdictions. There has been no declaration of Martial Law within the United States since Abraham Lincoln. Had there been a declaration of martial law, the commensurate lockdowns would have been unmistakable.
 
The Constitution is an interesting document. It doesn’t define Martial Law, but it does define who can declare it (President, Congress, and, state governors). Declarations and their consequences are subject to Constitutional review.
 
To be clear, the entirety of the US is NOT currently under Martial Law, and it hasn’t been for more than 150 years. True, martial law has been declared 68 times in US history. All but one have been at the state or regional level.
 
If you’ve gained anything from this article, please share it.
 
Below is a list of core topics for the reader to explore:
 
The military is restricted concerning enforcement of civilian law (Posse Comitatus Act)
Civilians not associated with Military ops are not subject to military tribunal
The DoD Law of War manual (as updated in 2023) governs US military occupation of foreign nations/territories
 

Ignorance and Manipulation Continue to Run Deep

Posted on by

 

During discussions on the school playground at the Northumberland County Board of Supervisors meeting held Nov 14th Holly Wargo, Tara Booth, and Dana Obier via Zoom, all demonstrated a fundamental lack of mathematical understanding. Or did they?
While discussing the fate of the NES playground, each argued that since reimbursements for previous projects have come in that those amounts are available to spend AGAIN. This is either jaw-dropping ignorance that should not exist in an educational institution at any level OR it’s a social manipulation born of the arrogant assumption that the tax payers are equally ignorant.

Before we get too far down the road, lets make sure everyone understands the basics of how grants work.

When the schools or any other department of government has a project that is outside the economic capabilities of, in this case the county’s, budget to just pay for outright, that department, in this case NUCPS, seeks a grant.
With an approved grant in hand, the financial risk to the county is mitigated. The county then is able and required to provide initial funding for the project – the grant money is not available for reimbursement until AFTER the project is completed. When the project is completed, the department files for reimbursement from the grant source providing evidence of completion. When the reimbursement arrives, the “Loan” made to the project by the county is paid off. Like a bank on a car loan, when you pay it off, they don’t just give you more money to go spend on what ever you want. You would need to apply for another loan to buy your next purchase.

More simply put, you can’t spend grant money twice.

This basic mathematical principal should be universally understood by school children and unquestioned by adults. Yet, here in Northumberland County, we have members of the School Board as well as the schools Administration who will tell you that reimbursement money is available for spending – seemingly indefinitely. And it isn’t. These are the people responsible for more than half of county revenue. Failing to understand basic finance math is unforgivable.

But is that all there is?

During the Board of supervisors meeting, Chip Williams had prearranged a presentation of sorts to be reviewed by Luttrel Tadlock. The history of issues with the playground go back at least to 2014. In the intervening years, there have been several imprudent missteps.
Most recently, there were a series of construction projects that were to be funded using an ESSER grant moneys. Only one project was child safety critical – the playground. In spite of Holly Wargo’s vehement declaration on June 15 of 2023 that the playground would be the priority, it wasn’t. It was put on the back burner in favor of less critical school infrastructure such as resurfacing of the track in support of state level sporting events – arguably nowhere near as critical as a rundown playground.
At the end of the day, NUCPS had the funds to repair and replace the playground and it didn’t happen. NOW, Dana Obier claims it’s on the county to pay for it, raising property taxes and erasing good efforts made on gaining control of the budget process. The School Board couldn’t do the right thing when they had the money. They made bad choices and now want the people of Northumberland County to pay to clean up the mess that they’ve made through gross neglect.

So, is the School Board this ignorant or are they playing politics relying on the people of Northumberland County to be ignorant?

To be fair, only one member of the School Board has been brazenly toxic on the topic – as is consistent with that member’s personality. There have been no public discussions on the playground by the School Board and no motions or votes providing direction from the School Board. Yet, it is School Board policy that in such cases, School Board action is required. To think that All School Board members are on the same page as Ms. Obier would be unreasonable. Surely the other members are aware of their own policies as would normally be the case for Administration and staff members. And yet we are faced with this conundrum; Are members of the School Board and Administration ignorant? It appears so.
They’ve spoken ignorantly to the topic of grant reimbursements while at the same time relying on the public to be ignorant enough to buy their story.
It’s a long road to gaining credibility on this topic for the Schools. With a long history of financial obfuscation, the people should be wary of how the schools move forward.

The Journey From Fifty Thousand Feet

Posted on by

Looking back on events of the last eight years, or for some of us, even longer, It’s been about pitting Americans against each other. For that matter, it’s been this way around the world. America is certainly not the only place it’s been happening but it is where it matters most. As Ronald Reagan said; “If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.”

In this article, the individual events and the driving motives behind them won’t be dissected. They will be used to illustrate a pattern that might not otherwise be obvious – to some. Each point here warrants its own article. Over time those articles will be written. For now, this is a look at a few bricks on the road we’ve been on.

Rioters attempt to enter the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Eric Lee / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

On January 6, 2021, a day that will soon come to be known as America’s own Bastille Day, if it wasn’t already clear, an ongoing argument started. On the one side, the media, with its bullhorn, immediately and without proof claimed the events were all part of a planned insurrection. But even before that, on the other side, tens of thousands of Americans showed up to protest a stolen election.

Believe what they say not what you see

The larger news media outlets immediately pounced on the story claiming that all of those, mostly overweight middle-aged and unarmed Americans staged an insurrection. In doing so, the media effectively silenced the millions on the other side with their subtle subversion of fact.

To be sure, the Americans at the capital that day witnessed a coup. They watched as the media vigorously denied any wrongdoing inserting words like “without proof,” “unsubstantiated” literally without proof or substantiation of such assertions in their reporting. All they had to do was say it and it was so; without question.

But for those who stayed up late on November 3, 2020, the proof of a coup was an “in your face” reality as vote counts on TV screens flipped up and down all in favor of one candidate in the wee hours of the morning of November fourth. Nobody needed more proof of wrongdoing, or so one would think.

To put things in a little perspective, there were so many people there that day that, if they had intended to execute an insurrection, they would have been successful even though they were unarmed – unarmed; gotta think on that.

Throughout the last, almost 4 years, the world has been witness to moral offenses on a massive scale, the government endorsed, and in many cases forced sex changes, men in women’s sports and bathrooms, the FBI labeling parents as domestic terrorists for opposing Department of Education’s self-proclaimed authority to subvert the will of the parent and so much more. The growth of gender variations from the 2 that biology permits to an unbound number as declared by, well mostly college students. Making sense of it all is difficult at best, unless…

And how does one measure the success of a psychological operation?

To be sure, the events of January 6 and those that followed have resulted in a divided America; between those that see the world as reported by government and corporate interests and those that can see and dig more honestly as a matter of civic pride and responsibility.

At face value, the events and the reporting can be very confusing. On the one hand, we have a government and it’s politicians advocating for the death of their political opponent(s) while simultaneously fomenting fear that that same political opponent will do the same to the people if elected. If it’s such a certainty, why didn’t he do that in his first term? This is what the media is and has been selling for years.

It’s more than difficult to make sense of it all. It’s as if a switch was flipped and, poof, no more free will unless you’re in the club. If you aren’t in the club you are wrong. All because of an alleged insurrection. But, what if the media is all wrong? What if those tens of thousands of people there that day and the 100+ million that couldn’t be there were right? That our government in collusion with media, corporations, the alphabet soup that includes FBI, CIA, and DHS, has been subverted for the personal gain of an elite few; this last beacon of freedom stolen?

A government calling for civil war

The violent protests demonstrating the hatred of half a country get labeled as “Mostly Peaceful” by the government and media. All while protests of any kind in opposition get labeled as insurrection, racist extremism, or “Far-right.” And yet, to the casual observer, the opposite is true. Those mostly peaceful protests destroyed

A protester runs past burning cars and buildings on Chicago Avenue, in St. Paul, Minn. on May 30th, 2020 John Minchillo/AP/Shutterstock

or ended people’s lives. The foot soldiers of those protests justify their actions with words like “Racist,” and “Oppressor.” Those protests are not only advocated by politicians, politicians call for them while condemning anything opposing their views.

The contrast in the reflexive nature of this brave new world order is astounding.

One group is praised for burning businesses down, destroying and even ending lives while the side that sees this as wrong is condemned for saying so.

Hatred is evil

There is a hatred festering on one side that can’t be argued with. Reason fails to penetrate as evidenced by the persistent canned responses. There is no appreciation of the dichotomy that has been created. Our children are on a rampage bent on the destruction of a nation that their school teachers and professors not only failed to teach but instead engaged in the indoctrination of revisionist hatred; a process identical to education. It is those college-aged individuals that have held center stage with the news media; reaping the publicity rewards of constant churn, shock, and awe and the seemingly never-ending virtue signaling.

Who’s side are they on?

The hatred is encouraged and supported by the government and the media. Corporations support the subversion with touted corporate policies such as “Environmental, social, and governance” or ESG, the corporate version of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI). ESG policies have cost employers in market share as employees now have significant “authority” in the workplace. Doing the job one is hired for is a secondary priority. Corporations have engaged in government-like activities, denying services to some for spurious reasons while granting others full access based on “Club Membership.”

So, where did the hatred campaign start?

We can trace all of this back many generations but we’ll start more recently. Remember Jane Fonda, Abby Hoffman, and others? The period of Vietnam was likewise polarizing to this nation, eclipsing the unity brought by man’s landing on the moon. Then, on May 4, 1970, The Ohio National Guard fired on students protesting the Vietnam “War” at Kent State University. The event soon became known as “The Kent State Massacre.” Four students were killed and nine others were wounded (one of them paralyzed from the waist down). Hatred indeed.

Of the people, by the people, for the people

And that hatred has been turned on its head. Kent State gave birth to a more than healthy skepticism of government. A government that would give the order to fire on students ought not to be trusted. In today’s world, the hatred stems from the government, a generation of youth that screams in our faces about issues that don’t seem to exist. At least not as they describe them. 

Figure 2: Joe Biden / IMAGE: @benshapiro via Twitt

One such indicator of a government’s hatred of her people occurred on September 1, 2022. President Joe Biden gave a speech of hatred. Often in elevated outrage, the likes of which could easily be compared to that of Stalin. With condemnation and threat targeting more than half a nation with his hyperbole, the scene was staged in red lighting, deliberately creating a menacing ambiance. As messages go, this one was loud and clear.

This is no accident

And it’s all on purpose. This comes as no surprise; we were warned many times over (several future articles are coming on this point). One such warning came on April 3, 1965, when broadcaster Paul Harvey gave a famous diatribe titled “If I Were the Devil.” In it, he says; “I would substitute Psychology for Religion and Deify Science.” The deification of science has happened, but it isn’t true science. By extension of Paul’s Substitutions, Science has become a false religion, one not resembling true science at all.

The sun comes up every day

Plymouth Rock, as it has been for four hundred and four years.

Yet another doctrine in the form of the new religion that we are expected to accept, without evidence, is “man-made climate change.” During the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, the world was headed for a new ice age. Then came acid rain in the 80’s and early 90’s. Around 1994, they claimed man-made global warming was an existential threat and we all needed to repent. Today with all of these variations behind us, it’s referred to, if non-descriptively, as “climate change.” The “experts” claimed the polar ice was melting and then it came back stronger all on its own. They preached sea level rise while Plymouth Rock continues to survive high tides.

Opposing views are ridiculed. That summer is hot is not a valid point. Pointing out the obvious flaws is an exercise in futility. Thermometers in concrete heat syncs are accurate even though nobody checks on the accuracy or has any notion of impact on measurements imposed by, oh, a hot mass of concrete as opposed to a more natural environment. Applying local and artificially elevated measurements is inherently a bad argument, but don’t tell Greta that.

What people won’t believe

It’s called gaslighting. Gaslighting: a form of manipulation and psychological control where an individual or group deliberately feeds false information to another person or persons, leading them to question their memory, perception of reality, or mental stability. It preys on human weakness; The inherent need to be accepted by the larger group. Toward that end, many people will sacrifice their own beliefs and redirect their observations in favor of the group’s opinion.

Let’s imagine a group of individuals that collectively have control of nearly all information. Add to that the diversity of resources available to such a group. Now imagine a population completely content in the distraction of its lifestyle of material consumption. A population happily working 9 to 5 to pay for their consumption and too busy to perceive the difference between truth and lies. It’s a form of laziness. The human brain is a lazy thing. When stressed, the path to less stress is the one that requires the least amount of thinking. Thinking is hard and the very first suggestion that brings a conclusion is accepted as truth. Once accepted, that truth whether real or manufactured will be defended vigorously. It is easier to believe the most fanciful of tails as truth than it is to see that the emperor has no clothes after all.

For those familiar with how to tear down and rebuild a nation, the fact that what the media is selling, and what their followers believe and agitate for is all standard fare in the world of Psyops.

If the government and its media are wrong – lies actually, then it all makes sense and we are collectively embroiled in a massive PsyOP. One that Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and any good Bolshevik would respect.

Truly, nothing makes sense if we are simultaneously to believe that all is well while paying witness to the growth of chaos around us. Yet, if we suppose that it’s all on purpose with designs to a specific end, it begins to become clear.

So, how much does it take for the people to get up?

Many more events have taken place and will continue to take place. It’s all more of the same. News cycles that no longer resemble news serve as camouflage for unseen truths. There is an egocentrism in America. It’s all about us. Rarely do we seek insight into the lives of those in other countries Our neighbors to the north and south of us are in a world of, well, shit. But we don’t see it or most don’t. In our own country, California legalizes pedophilia and the people sit. Illegal immigrants are registered to vote, and the people sit. Emigrant crime is insane, and the people sit. To believe that someone else will fix this without our help is the epitome of disengagement. Sitting in front of a computer screen typing 50 times a day “God Wins” doesn’t help God to win.

Something we shouldn’t forget

We have more than we know, more than we were taught. There are four branches of government. The three that we were all taught are subservient to the one that isn’t taught – “We The People.” We the people established our constitution, it’s ours, not our government’s. It is our tool to keep our government in line, not the other way around.

There are a little fewer than 3300 counties and incorporated cities in this country. Imagine what could happen if people started showing up at their community board meetings, and participating locally. Watching videos of those who do is not enough. Just commit to doing it. Start. Everything else will fall into place.

A civilization only works if those who live within it agree. We all agree to stop at four-way intersections. We agree to not take violent action against others – we used to anyway. The greater the numbers in masses, the fewer points of agreement can be achieved and, by extension, the smaller our government should be. In place of otherwise too many restrictions, good judgment must prevail.

So, how much does it take before we figure out what we can all agree on?

The LGBTQ+ progressive movement: part of the indoctrination in our schools, everyday lives and prison system

Posted on by

Open Letter on “The New Normal”

by Chris Quaglin

I have been shocked for years at the ever growing cancer that we call the LGBTQ+ progressive movement that has slowly taken over America. This cancer has created a “new norm” in our everyday lives. I’ve experienced this first and second hand in America’s public school system, in my everyday life, and now, as a political prisoner/hostage for participation in the January 6th capitol “mostly peaceful protest” I see it everyday in the federal prison system as well.

Before your Ultra-MAGA radar goes off, Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) takes over, and you go full “Karen”, let me explain my thought process a little deeper. Believe it or not I consider myself just your average everyday electrician. My catch phrase is: “I’m just a dumb electrician from New Jersey.” The only difference is that where the average American is scared to go against the grain and say something, I’m not. I don’t give a crap about your feelings. Don’t like it? Tough. This is America.

I have no problem with you being gay. I have members among both family and friends (j6ers included) that I love with all my heart and would take a bullet for without a moments hesitation. I don’t care if you’re gay or trans or if you consider yourself one of these made up 47 genders that are the new fad in 2024. I might not understand or even agree with your lifestyle. But guess what? I don’t have to. It’s your life, not mine. You’re an adult. Your life choices are YOUR choices. That’s what makes America great.

What I DO have a problem with and where I draw the line is when ANYONE indoctrinates and brainwashes America’s children into sexual activities that they have no business being involved with. It’s rape. Before you argue, any sexual act with a child is rape according to the law. The “new norm” that the LGBTQ+ progressives are pushing is that “age is just a number.” It’s disgusting and it has to come to a stop immediately. America’s children are OFF LIMITS!

A lot of Americans woke up to the LGBTQ+ agenda when COVID-19 came to town. America’s mothers and fathers were forced to stay home for 2 years and started to hear, first hand, day in and day out what nonsense the schools were peddling to their children. Instead of the history or geometry that these kids should have been learning (kids being kids), our newest generation of young Americans were being taught about anal sex, the “47 genders” that you might be but never knew it, and that its perfectly acceptable, even encouraged, to NOT tell your parents about the things you’ve been learning in school because “they just wouldn’t understand.” This left wing progressive movement that is sweeping our country then tried making laws about “keeping parents out of the classroom” (which they have been pushing slowly for the past 2 decades). These laws would (and have) kept parents from knowing what is being taught to their own flesh and blood. YOU WILL NOT brainwash the next generation of Americans. Patriots like myself see what’s going on and I’m here to tell you… OUR KIDS ARE A NO GO ZONE!!!

I saw this “age is just a number” nonsense in our everyday lives first hand. the LGBTQ+ agenda has been a slow progression from “gay rights” and “its OK to be gay” to what we see going on right now. we see it in almost every gay pride festival or parade. Young kids as young as 5 or 6 years old forcibly introduced to barely covered or completely naked grown men and women. just one example of this child endangerment was the gay pride bike ride in Philadelphia last year where hundreds of naked men and women rode around the city stark naked with no regard for public indecency laws or child endangerment laws. Instead of the Main Stream Media reporting on this real problem they, instead, report that normal adults are the problem for speaking out against “the new normal.” We are now labeled “trans-phobic” or accused of “gay bashing.” No, we are none of these things. We are simply stating that our kids deserve to be kids and what you are doing is against the law, end of story!

Now that I have entered the federal prison system in a “low security” I see, first hand, the same programming done here as well. This is at a whole new level and no one told me to expect this. I don’t think that anyone knew that the indoctrination had gotten so bad behind bars; honestly. Not unlike the public school system in America, we are not only treated like property, we are property in the prison system. people in charge tell us what to do, how to act, and try to tell us how to think. “the new norm” is part of the indoctrination in America’s federal prison system and we are being forced to comply with the system’s “new normal.” We are told that we must not only share common area but now forced to share a cell with a S.O. (sex offender). We must never get in a fight with a S.O. or we will probably get charged with a HATE CRIME. That’s right, the man who raped your child, the teacher who got caught with a million kiddy porn pictures is 100% protected in prison.

Its not that they, the S.O., are given their own compound, given their own barracks, or even given their own cells. It’s that the rest of the inmates are expected to pander to and bow down to “the new norm” just like you are expected to do whether it be in a federal school, or walking down the street in the “free world.” I am currently in a “low security” compound that is over run (approximately 40%) with sex offenders, child molesters, child porn freaks, rapists, etc.. “The new norm” group makes the other 60% (every other race, creed, and religion) who have kids of their own comply. Comply or “get a shot” (a write up) and get thrown in the hole, have the few privileges that we have taken from us for months, “good time credit” stripped away from us which in turn keeps us away from our family even longer. These are an absolute given. Chances are any inmate who gets into an altercation with a S.O. will also get a new set of charges including hate crimes. Those can add anywhere from 6 months to 5 years to anyone’s sentence and raise them to another prison level. Not only that but now that S.O. involved in the incident can use that incident to apply for compassionate release. Welcome to 2024.

The real question is who in the Biden administration and who in the B.O.P. are setting these prisons up like this? This is a military-like atmosphere. “I’m only following orders” or “that’s above my pay grade” are the main responses from anyone who is asked a question. So again, the million dollar question is; who is the puppet master? Who is the one pulling the strings? Who are giving the orders in our prisons? They should know the simple fact: KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, ESPECIALLY IN PRISON!!!

Welcome to the “new normal” that the LGBTQ+ progressives have successfully implemented in our school system, everyday lives, and prison system in 2024. Will anyone put a stop to this ever-growing cancer? I for one will continue to preach to anyone with enough common sense that “the new normal” is ANYTHING BUT NORMAL and that it has no place in America. I don’t care how you run, or what you do in your own life as an adult. That is for you and only you to decide. That’s what makes America the land of the free. Where I draw the line are our kids and their right to be kids. I say to the puppet master pulling the strings one last time. AMERICA’S KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS!!!

-Chris Quaglin

January 6th federal prisoner 38648-509

This letter is submitted by TinFrog with permission on behalf of the author

Extremism’s: Project 2025 as ordinance in an information war

Posted on by

It’s interesting to observe the angst, for different reasons, over the proposals in the “Project 2025” document and how groups associated with the extremes of any side use project 2025 as a bi-polar psychological weapon.

My point?

The overwhelming majority of humanity, not just Americans, lives in the middle – or what used to be middle. All of us spend too much time anymore on the shiny extremes and not enough on the rational middle. Why? Because the ordinance in this war is 100% extremism – it’s all about “shock and awe.”

For Example:

Prior to 2020, one of my step sons (a liberal college grad) was railing against the “prison industrial complex.” I was peripherally aware but was put off by the misappropriation of “industrial complex”; his description made it extreme in my mind. (make a PsyOp note on that last bit). And then, after Jaunuary 6, I began supporting the J6 POW’s; visiting jails, courts etc. Not only was he, my step son, right but it’s a rage we now both share.

If not for extreme language, we all might agree more.

Now, is it possible to identify what we agree on regarding “Project 2025” through the fog of extremism’s?

Extremism’s are polarizing by nature and it’s on purpose. They’re a huge part of marketing, including politics, because they’re effective, but are they necessary in our interactions?

The second hand smoke argument was polarizing because both sides went to extremes and became divided on the issue. The truth in polarizing arguments is ALWAYS somewhere in the middle. Just yesterday, I was talking to my mother about the recent overturning of Roe v Wade. I had to explain that there has never been legislation passed at the federal level legalizing abortion. That judges cannot legislate from the bench and that the 1973 decision was wrong because the federal government had no jurisdiction; that such jurisdiction belongs to the states. If I put aside the question of “Right or Wrong” regarding abortion, the jurisdiction point is in the middle. Beyond opinions on the topic, lobbying state legislators for legislation is the constitutional process the people can and should engage in in their home state.

To be sure, It’s a challenge to identify the middle through the fog of our own extremism’s, and we all have them. All to often our mental and emotional reflexes cause us to chose and defend our position without the intervention of any internal analysis. It’s rare that we see this in our day-to-day existence without practice. For purposes of educational demonstration, a knowledgeable friend of mine, @RealCoachMel, asked a question in a post a couple weeks ago – I’m paraphrasing here; “What’s wrong with project 2025 and why?” Done correctly, for every item identified in project 2025 one would need to ask oneself the question; “Do I agree or disagree?” and then, the most important part, look in the mirror and answer the question of “Why?” How does one come to believe what they believe or favor one construct over another? The answer, if explored correctly, is amazing, but I’ll leave that discussion for another day. For now, we all need to map out middle ground.