Identifying Indoctrination in our Education Systems

Within the United States, and in fact across the globe, we see schools hijacked, indoctrinating generations of the young toward an agenda. While parents and communities protest, nation states and states within the US have been forcing this indoctrination, with the result being a total lack of critical thought processes for far too many. A lack of quality education and its gift of critical thought makes all of humanity weak, lacking the ability to resist or even identify propaganda.

When combating the core existential threat of global cultural indoctrination, distinguishing the similarities and differences between Education and Indoctrination is paramount.

Differences between Education and Indoctrination:

Education seeks to develop critical thinking, curiosity, and independent reasoning by presenting evidence-based information, encouraging questioning, and fostering open inquiry. It equips individuals with the tools to analyze, evaluate, and form their own conclusions.

Indoctrination aims to instill specific beliefs or ideologies, often without room for questioning or critical examination. It prioritizes conformity to a predetermined narrative, discouraging dissent or independent thought.

The key difference lies in intent and method: education empowers individuals to think for themselves, while indoctrination seeks to shape beliefs to align with a specific agenda.

Methodologies differ between the two as demanded by the differing motivations.

========================

The methodologies of education and indoctrination differ significantly in their approaches, goals, and execution. Below are key differences in their methodologies:

Education

  1. Critical Thinking and Inquiry:
    • Encourages questioning, skepticism, and exploration of multiple perspectives.
    • Uses Socratic methods, discussions, and debates to foster analytical skills.
    • Example: Students might analyze primary sources to form their own interpretations of historical events.
  2. Evidence-Based Learning:
    • Relies on empirical data, peer-reviewed research, and verifiable facts.
    • Teaches students how to evaluate sources for credibility and bias.
    • Example: A science class might involve experiments to test hypotheses, with results driving conclusions.
  3. Open-Ended Exploration:
    • Promotes curiosity and allows for ambiguity or uncertainty in answers.
    • Encourages students to pursue their own interests within a subject.
    • Example: A literature class might ask students to interpret a novel’s themes without prescribing a “correct” interpretation.
  4. Diverse Perspectives:
    • Exposes students to competing ideas, theories, or worldviews to broaden understanding.
    • Encourages respectful dialogue and consideration of opposing views.
    • Example: A history curriculum might include accounts from multiple sides of a conflict.
  5. Skill Development:
    • Focuses on teaching transferable skills like problem-solving, logic, and communication.
    • Aims to prepare individuals for independent decision-making in varied contexts.
    • Example: Math education emphasizes logical reasoning and problem-solving techniques applicable beyond the classroom.
  6. Feedback and Reflection:
    • Uses assessments to gauge understanding and encourage improvement, not enforce compliance.
    • Encourages self-reflection and metacognition (thinking about one’s own thinking).
    • Example: Essays or projects are graded with constructive feedback to improve critical analysis.

Indoctrination

  1. Dogmatic Instruction:
    • Presents a single worldview or ideology as unquestionably true.
    • Discourages or punishes questioning of the prescribed beliefs.
    • Example: A group might teach that a specific political or religious doctrine is the only valid perspective.
  2. Repetition and Memorization:
    • Relies on rote learning of specific ideas, slogans, or texts to instill beliefs.
    • Prioritizes acceptance over understanding.
    • Example: Repeatedly reciting a group’s manifesto without analyzing its content.
  3. Controlled Information:
    • Limits exposure to alternative viewpoints or conflicting evidence.
    • Filters or censors information to align with the desired narrative.
    • Example: Only providing texts that support a specific ideology while excluding others.
  4. Emotional Manipulation:
    • Uses fear, guilt, or loyalty to enforce adherence to beliefs.
    • Appeals to emotions rather than reason to shape attitudes.
    • Example: Framing dissent as betrayal or moral failure to discourage independent thought.
  5. Authority-Driven:
    • Relies on the authority of a leader, text, or institution to dictate truth.
    • Discourages individual interpretation in favor of obedience.
    • Example: A teacher or leader might insist their interpretation of a text is the only valid one.
  6. Punishment for Non-Conformity:
    • Uses social pressure, ostracism, or penalties to enforce compliance.
    • Assessments, if present, test adherence to the ideology rather than understanding.
    • Example: Students might be penalized for expressing views that challenge the group’s doctrine.

Summary of Differences

  • Education employs methodologies that prioritize intellectual freedom, critical analysis, and exposure to diverse ideas. It uses evidence, open dialogue, and skill-building to empower independent thought.
  • Indoctrination relies on control, repetition, and emotional or social pressure to enforce conformity to a specific belief system, limiting critical engagement and alternative perspectives.

These methodological differences reflect the core distinction: education fosters autonomy, while indoctrination demands allegiance.

==================

While education and indoctrination differ significantly in intent and methodology, they share some similarities, particularly in their structures and processes, which can sometimes make them appear superficially alike. Below are key similarities:

  1. Structured Delivery of Information:
    • Both involve organized systems for imparting knowledge or beliefs, often through formal settings like classrooms, lectures, or training sessions.
    • Example: A school curriculum (education) and a religious indoctrination program might both use structured lessons to convey content.
  2. Use of Authority Figures:
    • Both rely on teachers, leaders, or instructors to guide the learning process.
    • Example: A teacher in a classroom (education) and a charismatic leader in a cult (indoctrination) both hold positions of influence over learners.
  3. Repetition for Reinforcement:
    • Both may use repetition to reinforce concepts or ideas, ensuring retention.
    • Example: Education might involve repeated practice of math formulas, while indoctrination might involve reciting ideological slogans.
  4. Social Environment:
    • Both often occur in group settings, leveraging social dynamics to facilitate learning or acceptance.
    • Example: Classrooms foster peer interaction for collaborative learning, while indoctrination groups use peer pressure to encourage conformity.
  5. Goal of Shaping Perspectives:
    • Both aim to influence how individuals think or view the world, though their approaches differ.
    • Example: Education seeks to develop critical thinking about societal issues, while indoctrination seeks to align beliefs with a specific ideology.
  6. Use of Texts or Materials:
    • Both utilize books, texts, or media to convey ideas or information.
    • Example: A history textbook in education and a propaganda pamphlet in indoctrination both serve as tools to transmit content.
  7. Assessment or Evaluation:
    • Both may include methods to assess understanding or adherence, such as tests, discussions, or demonstrations of loyalty.
    • Example: Education uses exams to test comprehension, while indoctrination might test commitment to a cause through loyalty displays.

Key Distinction Within Similarities

While these similarities exist, the intent and execution differ sharply. Education uses these methods to foster independent thought and critical analysis, aiming for intellectual growth. Indoctrination employs them to enforce conformity and limit questioning, prioritizing adherence to a specific agenda. The overlap in structure can sometimes blur the line, but the underlying purpose—empowerment versus control—sets them apart.

Economic insights in Northumberland County Virginia (pt. 2) – The challenges

In a previous post, we looked at economic opportunities in Northumberland County. Today, we’re going to take a look at a few challenges. Northumberland County, Virginia, faces several economic challenges that impact its development and growth. The county, located on the Northern Neck and part of the Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace AVA winemaking appellation, has a population of 11,839 as of the 2020 census.

Historical Context and Demographics

Northumberland County was officially formed in 1648, making it one of the oldest counties in Virginia. The county is located on the Northern Neck, bordered by the Rappahannock River to the south and the Potomac River to the north, with the Chesapeake Bay to the east. As of the 2020 census, the population was 11,839, with a population density of 41 people per square mile. The county has a significant water area, comprising 33.0% of its total area, which affects land use and economic activities.

Economic Challenges

  • Limited Industrial Base: The county’s economy is heavily reliant on a few key industries, such as seafood processing, manufacturing, and tourism. This lack of diversity makes the local economy vulnerable to market fluctuations and industry-specific downturns. Northumberland County has a relatively small and limited industrial employment base, with the lion’s share of employment positions held by just a few. The largest employers in the county include the Northumberland County School Board, Omega Protein, Manufacturing Techniques Inc., and the County of Northumberland. Again, while these employers provide jobs, the lack of diverse industries can make the local economy vulnerable to economic downturns and changes in specific sectors.

  • Rural Isolation and Infrastructure: The rural nature of Northumberland County, with a low population density of 41 people per square mile, presents challenges in attracting new businesses and investments. The county’s remote location and limited access to major transportation networks can deter potential investors. 

  • Workforce Development: The Northumberland County Economic Development Commission and Public Schools have organized a Career and Job Exposition to address workforce development issues. This event aims to connect job seekers with employers and highlight the skills needed in the local job market. However, the county may still face challenges in providing a skilled workforce that meets the needs of modern industries.

  • Infrastructure: The county’s infrastructure, including roads and utilities such as water, wastewater management, electricity, and broadband internet, may not be as developed as in more urban areas. This can hinder economic growth and the ability to attract and retain businesses that require robust infrastructure.

  • Tourism and Seasonal Employment: Tourism is an important sector in Northumberland County, with attractions such as the Indian Creek Yacht and Country Club and various seafood-related businesses. However, tourism is often seasonal, leading to fluctuations in employment and income. This seasonality can create economic instability for residents who rely on tourism-related jobs.

  • Agricultural Decline: Once a significant part of the county’s economy, agriculture has faced challenges due to changing market conditions and environmental factors. The decline in traditional farming activities has led to a reduction in agricultural employment and income. However, the county is part of the Northern Neck George Washington Birthplace AVA winemaking appellation, which offers some potential for agricultural diversification.

  • Economic Development Efforts: Despite these challenges, the Northumberland County Economic Development Commission is actively working to retain and expand existing businesses and attract new ones. The commission’s strategic plan focuses on enhancing economic activities to benefit all businesses and citizens.

These challenges highlight the need for continued efforts to diversify the economy, improve infrastructure, and develop a skilled workforce to support sustainable economic growth in Northumberland County.

Addressing Economic Challenges

  • Diversification of the Economy: Efforts to diversify the local economy are essential. This can include promoting small businesses, supporting the growth of the winemaking industry, and attracting new industries that align with the county’s character, resources, and strengths. Diversification can help reduce the county’s vulnerability to economic shocks and create more stable employment opportunities.

  • Investment in Infrastructure: Investing in infrastructure, particularly water and sewer management, transportation, electric grid, and any remaining high-speed internet dark spots, can improve the overall environment and attract new businesses. Better infrastructure can also enhance the quality of life for residents and make the county more attractive to potential investors and residents.

  • Workforce Training: Enhancing workforce training and education programs is crucial for developing a skilled labor force. Partnerships between local schools, community colleges, and businesses can provide targeted training and education that aligns with the needs of the local economy.

  • Support for Small Businesses: Providing support and resources for small businesses can help foster entrepreneurship and innovation. This can include access to capital, business development services, and networking opportunities.

  • Community Engagement and Collaboration: Engaging the local community in economic development efforts can ensure that initiatives are aligned with the needs and priorities of residents. Collaboration between local government, businesses, and community organizations can create a more cohesive and effective approach to economic development.

Summary Table

Economic Challenge

Description

Potential Solutions

Limited Industrial Base

Small and limited industrial base, making the economy vulnerable to sector-specific changes.

Diversify the economy by promoting small businesses and attracting new industries.

Agricultural Decline

Decline in traditional farming activities, reducing agricultural employment and income.

Promote agricultural diversification, such as the winemaking industry.

Tourism and Seasonal Employment

The seasonal nature of tourism leading to economic instability.

Develop year-round tourism activities and support seasonal businesses.

Rural Isolation and Infrastructure

Limited access to high-speed internet and modern transportation networks.

Invest in infrastructure, particularly in transportation and high-speed internet.

Workforce Development

Need for skilled labor and training programs.

Enhance workforce training and education programs, including partnerships with local schools and businesses.

Economic Development Initiatives

Limited resources and the effectiveness of economic development initiatives.

Increase support for the Northumberland County Economic Development Commission and foster community engagement.

By addressing these challenges, Northumberland County can work towards a more resilient and prosperous economic future.

——————————————————————————————

This post is based on the writer’s observations and other resources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northumberland_County,_Virginia
https://www.co.northumberland.va.us/edc
https://www.northumberlandcoc.org/economic-profile/

——————————————————————————————

Economic insights in Northumberland County Virginia (Pt. 1)

This article is the first in a series of articles targeting economic climate and opportunities in Northumberland County Virginia
 
Northumberland County, Virginia, offers several opportunities in light manufacturing, based on the region’s economic structure and available resources. The following summarizes areas where opportunities may exist:
  • Value-Added Food Manufacturing:

 
Northumberland County benefits from its location, which could support the expansion or establishment of value-added food manufacturing. In particular, sea food. The county is part of Virginia, which has a higher location quotient for value-added food processes, indicating a specialization in this sector. This could include food processing units, packaging facilities, or specialized product lines like gourmet or organic foods.
Home to multiple aquaculture businesses, Northumberland County has room for growth.
  • Marine and Boat-Related Manufacturing:

Given Northumberland County’s proximity to the Chesapeake Bay and the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers, there is potential for manufacturing related to boating and marine activities. This might include boat construction, repair parts, or equipment like marine hardware and accessories.
  • Craft and Specialty Manufacturing:

The county could leverage its rural charm and natural resources for craft manufacturing. This might involve small-scale production of local crafts, artisanal products, or specialty items that can attract tourists or be sold online. Examples include wooden furniture, decorative items, or local-themed souvenirs. There has been recent movement in furniture manufacturing with a pending permit cross from Cygnets restaurant.
  • Agricultural Support Manufacturing:

With agriculture being a significant part of Virginia’s economy, there’s an opportunity for manufacturing agricultural equipment, tools, or parts. This could range from simple farming implements to more specialized machinery tailored for local farming needs.
  • Educational and Workforce Development Support:

 
While not manufacturing directly, Northumberland County has a supportive educational framework for light manufacturing through Northumberland County Public Schools and potential partnerships with broader educational institutions in Virginia. This can aid in workforce development for any new manufacturing ventures, particularly in areas like welding, supported by programs like the Rockbridge Area Advanced Manufacturing Project (RAAMP) for example in other regions. Developing similar post-high school training and education more locally to Northumberland would help foster and grow the local workforce.
 
  • Light Industrial Manufacturing:

As per general trends in Virginia, light industrial manufacturing jobs, including production operators, warehouse workers, and assembly roles, are available. Northumberland could attract businesses in this sector by offering incentives or utilizing the county’s strategic location for logistics.
 
Potential investors or entrepreneurs should consider local incentives, the availability of skilled labor, and infrastructure like transportation for goods distribution when exploring these opportunities. Engaging with local economic development offices could provide more targeted insights and support for establishing or expanding manufacturing operations in Northumberland County.
 
There are several topics presented here that will be unpacked in future updates to this article.

Disinformation via Deceptions of Omission

The purpose of this article is to, hopefully, reign in the craziness around the internet regarding deceptive points made by accounts with large followings. To that end, this article is a single point in a galaxy of points to be made.

 
Too many stories are incomplete. In being abridged, they are deceptive. Words mean something. Leaving important words out of a story is a lie of omission.
 
For years now, there has been a lie running through the veins of social media. One claiming that individuals that we know have committed crimes against the people of the US will be subject to military tribunals. In some of the more bold cases, the claims are that such tribunals have already taken place.
 

Today’s word of omission is “Jurisdiction”

According to Cornell’s Legal Information Institute
Jurisdiction can be defined as:
1) Power of a court to adjudicate cases and issue orders; or
2) Territory within which a court or government agency may properly exercise its power. See, e.g. Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co. et al., 526 U.S. 574 (1999).
Jurisdiction: An Overview
One of the most fundamental questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. A jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components:
The claims of pending as well as ongoing military tribunals against civilians is presented with admirably designed deceit. In specific, the claim is that certain civilians are currently facing or will be facing military tribunals. Many of the persons in question are elected officials, extremely wealthy persons, and heads of national institutions.
 
These claims would necessarily require the military’s jurisdiction to leapfrog over the Constitutional jurisdiction of civilian courts – a terrifying concept as such an overtaking of the courts would have far-reaching constitutional implications.
 

So What is the Jurisdiction of Military Tribunals?

According to Aaron Meyer Law:
In general, anyone who is subject to military law can be tried by a military tribunal. This includes:
  • Members of the armed forces. This encompasses all individuals who are serving or have served in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard. Active-duty personnel, reservists, and National Guard members are all subject to military law and can be tried by a military tribunal if they are accused of breaking the law.
  • Enemy combatants. Enemy combatants are individuals who are fighting against the United States in a war or other armed conflict. They can be tried by a military tribunal if they are accused of breaking the law.
  • Civilians working for the military. This includes contractors, employees of defense companies, and other civilians who are working for the military. Any of these individuals can find themselves subject to military law and in a military tribunal depending on the circumstances.

Again, words matter

The claims that civilians are subject to tribunals fail to articulate under what conditions any civilian might find themselves facing such tribunals. But in 1866, the US Supreme Court ruled on various questions in Ex Parte Milligan.
 
Justice Davis wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Justices Clifford, Field, Grier, and Nelson. The majority opinion stated that so long as civil courts were active at home, it was unconstitutional to try American citizens by military tribunal. They also said that Congress did not have the power to authorize a military commission in Indiana.
The majority also laid out the three situations where military tribunals were appropriate. They stated that Milligan must be released immediately as his rights had been violated and he had not been given due process of law.
 
Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/case.html
 
This case laid out the three types of military jurisdiction (taken from the site previously linked here):
  1. The first of these may be called jurisdiction under MILITARY LAW, and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war, or otherwise providing for the government of the national forces”
  2. The second may be distinguished as MILITARY GOVERNMENT, superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law, and exercised by the military commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress.”
  3. The third may be denominated MARTIAL LAW PROPER, and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the action of Congress cannot be invited, and in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion, or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities where ordinary law no longer adequately secures public safety and private rights.”
Point 3 is frequently misconstrued among those insisting that tribunals are happening under martial law or laws of war.
 
NOTE: DoD’s Law of war is specific to armed conflict. The manual does NOT apply to activities within the US and its territories; a condition where all bets are off. It is a document reflecting the DoD’s interpretation and application of international laws regarding how one state shall manage affairs within other states that it occupies.
 

Martial Law

Martial Law is a declared state – under all US jurisdictions. There has been no declaration of Martial Law within the United States since Abraham Lincoln. Had there been a declaration of martial law, the commensurate lockdowns would have been unmistakable.
 
The Constitution is an interesting document. It doesn’t define Martial Law, but it does define who can declare it (President, Congress, and, state governors). Declarations and their consequences are subject to Constitutional review.
 
To be clear, the entirety of the US is NOT currently under Martial Law, and it hasn’t been for more than 150 years. True, martial law has been declared 68 times in US history. All but one have been at the state or regional level.
 
If you’ve gained anything from this article, please share it.
 
Below is a list of core topics for the reader to explore:
 
The military is restricted concerning enforcement of civilian law (Posse Comitatus Act)
Civilians not associated with Military ops are not subject to military tribunal
The DoD Law of War manual (as updated in 2023) governs US military occupation of foreign nations/territories
 

The Journey From Fifty Thousand Feet

Looking back on events of the last eight years, or for some of us, even longer, It’s been about pitting Americans against each other. For that matter, it’s been this way around the world. America is certainly not the only place it’s been happening but it is where it matters most. As Ronald Reagan said; “If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.”

In this article, the individual events and the driving motives behind them won’t be dissected. They will be used to illustrate a pattern that might not otherwise be obvious – to some. Each point here warrants its own article. Over time those articles will be written. For now, this is a look at a few bricks on the road we’ve been on.

Rioters attempt to enter the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Eric Lee / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

On January 6, 2021, a day that will soon come to be known as America’s own Bastille Day, if it wasn’t already clear, an ongoing argument started. On the one side, the media, with its bullhorn, immediately and without proof claimed the events were all part of a planned insurrection. But even before that, on the other side, tens of thousands of Americans showed up to protest a stolen election.

Believe what they say not what you see

The larger news media outlets immediately pounced on the story claiming that all of those, mostly overweight middle-aged and unarmed Americans staged an insurrection. In doing so, the media effectively silenced the millions on the other side with their subtle subversion of fact.

To be sure, the Americans at the capital that day witnessed a coup. They watched as the media vigorously denied any wrongdoing inserting words like “without proof,” “unsubstantiated” literally without proof or substantiation of such assertions in their reporting. All they had to do was say it and it was so; without question.

But for those who stayed up late on November 3, 2020, the proof of a coup was an “in your face” reality as vote counts on TV screens flipped up and down all in favor of one candidate in the wee hours of the morning of November fourth. Nobody needed more proof of wrongdoing, or so one would think.

To put things in a little perspective, there were so many people there that day that, if they had intended to execute an insurrection, they would have been successful even though they were unarmed – unarmed; gotta think on that.

Throughout the last, almost 4 years, the world has been witness to moral offenses on a massive scale, the government endorsed, and in many cases forced sex changes, men in women’s sports and bathrooms, the FBI labeling parents as domestic terrorists for opposing Department of Education’s self-proclaimed authority to subvert the will of the parent and so much more. The growth of gender variations from the 2 that biology permits to an unbound number as declared by, well mostly college students. Making sense of it all is difficult at best, unless…

And how does one measure the success of a psychological operation?

To be sure, the events of January 6 and those that followed have resulted in a divided America; between those that see the world as reported by government and corporate interests and those that can see and dig more honestly as a matter of civic pride and responsibility.

At face value, the events and the reporting can be very confusing. On the one hand, we have a government and it’s politicians advocating for the death of their political opponent(s) while simultaneously fomenting fear that that same political opponent will do the same to the people if elected. If it’s such a certainty, why didn’t he do that in his first term? This is what the media is and has been selling for years.

It’s more than difficult to make sense of it all. It’s as if a switch was flipped and, poof, no more free will unless you’re in the club. If you aren’t in the club you are wrong. All because of an alleged insurrection. But, what if the media is all wrong? What if those tens of thousands of people there that day and the 100+ million that couldn’t be there were right? That our government in collusion with media, corporations, the alphabet soup that includes FBI, CIA, and DHS, has been subverted for the personal gain of an elite few; this last beacon of freedom stolen?

A government calling for civil war

The violent protests demonstrating the hatred of half a country get labeled as “Mostly Peaceful” by the government and media. All while protests of any kind in opposition get labeled as insurrection, racist extremism, or “Far-right.” And yet, to the casual observer, the opposite is true. Those mostly peaceful protests destroyed

A protester runs past burning cars and buildings on Chicago Avenue, in St. Paul, Minn. on May 30th, 2020 John Minchillo/AP/Shutterstock

or ended people’s lives. The foot soldiers of those protests justify their actions with words like “Racist,” and “Oppressor.” Those protests are not only advocated by politicians, politicians call for them while condemning anything opposing their views.

The contrast in the reflexive nature of this brave new world order is astounding.

One group is praised for burning businesses down, destroying and even ending lives while the side that sees this as wrong is condemned for saying so.

Hatred is evil

There is a hatred festering on one side that can’t be argued with. Reason fails to penetrate as evidenced by the persistent canned responses. There is no appreciation of the dichotomy that has been created. Our children are on a rampage bent on the destruction of a nation that their school teachers and professors not only failed to teach but instead engaged in the indoctrination of revisionist hatred; a process identical to education. It is those college-aged individuals that have held center stage with the news media; reaping the publicity rewards of constant churn, shock, and awe and the seemingly never-ending virtue signaling.

Who’s side are they on?

The hatred is encouraged and supported by the government and the media. Corporations support the subversion with touted corporate policies such as “Environmental, social, and governance” or ESG, the corporate version of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI). ESG policies have cost employers in market share as employees now have significant “authority” in the workplace. Doing the job one is hired for is a secondary priority. Corporations have engaged in government-like activities, denying services to some for spurious reasons while granting others full access based on “Club Membership.”

So, where did the hatred campaign start?

We can trace all of this back many generations but we’ll start more recently. Remember Jane Fonda, Abby Hoffman, and others? The period of Vietnam was likewise polarizing to this nation, eclipsing the unity brought by man’s landing on the moon. Then, on May 4, 1970, The Ohio National Guard fired on students protesting the Vietnam “War” at Kent State University. The event soon became known as “The Kent State Massacre.” Four students were killed and nine others were wounded (one of them paralyzed from the waist down). Hatred indeed.

Of the people, by the people, for the people

And that hatred has been turned on its head. Kent State gave birth to a more than healthy skepticism of government. A government that would give the order to fire on students ought not to be trusted. In today’s world, the hatred stems from the government, a generation of youth that screams in our faces about issues that don’t seem to exist. At least not as they describe them. 

Figure 2: Joe Biden / IMAGE: @benshapiro via Twitt

One such indicator of a government’s hatred of her people occurred on September 1, 2022. President Joe Biden gave a speech of hatred. Often in elevated outrage, the likes of which could easily be compared to that of Stalin. With condemnation and threat targeting more than half a nation with his hyperbole, the scene was staged in red lighting, deliberately creating a menacing ambiance. As messages go, this one was loud and clear.

This is no accident

And it’s all on purpose. This comes as no surprise; we were warned many times over (several future articles are coming on this point). One such warning came on April 3, 1965, when broadcaster Paul Harvey gave a famous diatribe titled “If I Were the Devil.” In it, he says; “I would substitute Psychology for Religion and Deify Science.” The deification of science has happened, but it isn’t true science. By extension of Paul’s Substitutions, Science has become a false religion, one not resembling true science at all.

The sun comes up every day

Plymouth Rock, as it has been for four hundred and four years.

Yet another doctrine in the form of the new religion that we are expected to accept, without evidence, is “man-made climate change.” During the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, the world was headed for a new ice age. Then came acid rain in the 80’s and early 90’s. Around 1994, they claimed man-made global warming was an existential threat and we all needed to repent. Today with all of these variations behind us, it’s referred to, if non-descriptively, as “climate change.” The “experts” claimed the polar ice was melting and then it came back stronger all on its own. They preached sea level rise while Plymouth Rock continues to survive high tides.

Opposing views are ridiculed. That summer is hot is not a valid point. Pointing out the obvious flaws is an exercise in futility. Thermometers in concrete heat syncs are accurate even though nobody checks on the accuracy or has any notion of impact on measurements imposed by, oh, a hot mass of concrete as opposed to a more natural environment. Applying local and artificially elevated measurements is inherently a bad argument, but don’t tell Greta that.

What people won’t believe

It’s called gaslighting. Gaslighting: a form of manipulation and psychological control where an individual or group deliberately feeds false information to another person or persons, leading them to question their memory, perception of reality, or mental stability. It preys on human weakness; The inherent need to be accepted by the larger group. Toward that end, many people will sacrifice their own beliefs and redirect their observations in favor of the group’s opinion.

Let’s imagine a group of individuals that collectively have control of nearly all information. Add to that the diversity of resources available to such a group. Now imagine a population completely content in the distraction of its lifestyle of material consumption. A population happily working 9 to 5 to pay for their consumption and too busy to perceive the difference between truth and lies. It’s a form of laziness. The human brain is a lazy thing. When stressed, the path to less stress is the one that requires the least amount of thinking. Thinking is hard and the very first suggestion that brings a conclusion is accepted as truth. Once accepted, that truth whether real or manufactured will be defended vigorously. It is easier to believe the most fanciful of tails as truth than it is to see that the emperor has no clothes after all.

For those familiar with how to tear down and rebuild a nation, the fact that what the media is selling, and what their followers believe and agitate for is all standard fare in the world of Psyops.

If the government and its media are wrong – lies actually, then it all makes sense and we are collectively embroiled in a massive PsyOP. One that Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and any good Bolshevik would respect.

Truly, nothing makes sense if we are simultaneously to believe that all is well while paying witness to the growth of chaos around us. Yet, if we suppose that it’s all on purpose with designs to a specific end, it begins to become clear.

So, how much does it take for the people to get up?

Many more events have taken place and will continue to take place. It’s all more of the same. News cycles that no longer resemble news serve as camouflage for unseen truths. There is an egocentrism in America. It’s all about us. Rarely do we seek insight into the lives of those in other countries Our neighbors to the north and south of us are in a world of, well, shit. But we don’t see it or most don’t. In our own country, California legalizes pedophilia and the people sit. Illegal immigrants are registered to vote, and the people sit. Emigrant crime is insane, and the people sit. To believe that someone else will fix this without our help is the epitome of disengagement. Sitting in front of a computer screen typing 50 times a day “God Wins” doesn’t help God to win.

Something we shouldn’t forget

We have more than we know, more than we were taught. There are four branches of government. The three that we were all taught are subservient to the one that isn’t taught – “We The People.” We the people established our constitution, it’s ours, not our government’s. It is our tool to keep our government in line, not the other way around.

There are a little fewer than 3300 counties and incorporated cities in this country. Imagine what could happen if people started showing up at their community board meetings, and participating locally. Watching videos of those who do is not enough. Just commit to doing it. Start. Everything else will fall into place.

A civilization only works if those who live within it agree. We all agree to stop at four-way intersections. We agree to not take violent action against others – we used to anyway. The greater the numbers in masses, the fewer points of agreement can be achieved and, by extension, the smaller our government should be. In place of otherwise too many restrictions, good judgment must prevail.

So, how much does it take before we figure out what we can all agree on?